Ad hoc Editorial Chamber (Hyun-soo Kim, Eric Yong Joong Lee & John Riley) YIJUN Institute of International Law, Korea
562 Gwangnaruro, Kwangjin-gu #201, Seoul 143-821, KOREA.
Corresponding Author: email@example.com
ⓒ Copyright YIJUN Institute of International Law
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Australia instituted proceedings against Japan before the International Court of Justice alleging that the JARPA II is violating the obligation of ICRW which prohibits the commercial whaling. Japan is strongly protesting against Australia arguing that the JARPA II has been carried out only for research whaling. This paper contains the Japan's position over the whaling in the South Pacific. The Japan's arguments are divided into two sections in this paper. First, it will check if whales are truly vulnerable following the Comprehensive Assessment of the IWC. Second, it argues the legitimacy of the JARPA II under international law.
Keywords : JARPA II, Minke Whale, ICRW, IWC, Schedule, ICJ
The Full Text is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2011.4.2.09